Business Corruption in Indonesia
Indonesia's business environment suffers from widespread political corr
uption and weak enforcement of anti-corruption legislation. The efficiency of business operations is restricted by a corrupt judiciary, complicating the process of dispute settlement and weakening property rights protections. Extensive bribery in Indonesia's public service is a reason for concern for foreign investors: Corruption at the borders is cited by companies as a problem, and public officials often exploit ambiguous legislation to extort informal payments and bribes from companies in the process of registering a business, filing tax reports or obtaining permits and licences. Illegal logging is threatening Indonesia's rainforests due to thousands of illegal logging permits being issued by public bodies. The
Law No 31/1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption
criminalises major acts of corruption - including active and passive bribery,
abuse of office
and
extortion
- and Indonesia's
Criminal Code
forbids embezzlement and gifts to public officials. The anti-corruption legal framework is deficient and does not address facilitation payments.
July 2015
GAN Integrity Solutions
Indonesian Judicial System
Indonesia's judicial system is susceptible to corruption as a result of ineffective regulatory mechanisms and conflicting legislation (
CCG 2014
). The outcome of judicial proceedings - including criminal investigations and court verdicts and appeals - can be influenced through bribes (
BTI 2014
). Corruption has deprived the judicial system of professionalism and objectivity; however, special corruption courts show a high degree of independency and often prosecute and convict Indonesian public officials for corrupt acts (BTI 2014). Dispute settlement mechanisms are inefficient and remain an area of concern for foreign companies (CCG 2014).
In 2013, a Constitutional Court Chief Justice, Akil Mochtar, was charged with accepting a USD 260,000 bribe in exchange for fixing a court ruling. Mochtar was found guilty and received a life sentence for corruption (
Deutsche Welle
, June 2014).
Indonesian Police
The Indonesian police is plagued by corruption, and bribery is widespread. Police officers solicit bribes on every level, ranging from traffic violations to criminal investigations (
HRR 2013
). Indonesians consider the police to be the most corrupt public institution in the country (
GCB 2013
).
One high-profile corruption case from 2013 involves an Indonesian police inspector general, Djoko Susilo, who was found guilty of corruption and money laundering and sentenced to 18 years in prison by the Jakarta High Court (
FitW 2014
). Mr. Susilo was ordered to pay a fine of more than USD 2.6 million and is now prohibited from voting or running for public office (
Jakarta Globe
, Dec. 2013).
Indonesian Public Services
Companies should be aware of a high-risk of corruption when dealing with Indonesia's public administration. The government's regulatory requirements are burdensome and implicate the process of obtaining permits and licences for foreign companies (
GCR 2014-2015
). There are increased costs of establishing an international company in Indonesia, because informal payments related to licences and permits are a key source of income for Indonesian officials; for example, companies have to make between 10 and 14 facilitation payments and bribes to public officials at the Department of Immigration when trying to obtain work visas for their employees (
Control Risks
, 2013). Indonesia's excessive
red tape
increases corruption risks for companies as there exist no clear legislative guidelines for facilitation payments.
Indonesian Land Administration
Corruption is rampant within the land management sector in Indonesia. Property rights are inadequately protected due to corruption (
BTI 2014
). Bribery is rife in land disputes, and the largest bribe usually lands the favourable outcome, resulting in land rights of foreign investors being completely unprotected (BTI 2014). The cost of registering property in Indonesia is twice as high as in other East Asian and Pacific countries (
DB 2015
).
Indonesian Tax Administration
International companies regularly encounter corruption during routine interactions with Indonesian public servants, including tax officials. Facilitation payments, kickbacks and bribes are a part of most inspections, in part due to Indonesia's decentralised government system and in part because of inconsistent implementation of legislation (
Control Risks
, 2013). Foreign business owners experience extortion and discriminatory tax fees (
CatC 2012
). However, most companies do not consider tax rates and regulations to be problematic for conducting business in Indonesia (
GCR 2014-2015
). The government of Indonesia loses about half of its annual tax revenue as a result of rampant corruption within the tax-collecting agency (
Jakarta Post
, Mar. 2012).
Indonesian Customs Administration
Corruption hampers the efficiency of Indonesia's customs administration. Procedures related to importing and exporting goods lack transparency and allow for customs officials to make demands for irregular payments (
GETR 2014
). Corruption at Indonesia's borders is the most problematic factor for international trade (GETR 2014). Indonesia's ports are rife with corruption; the risk of extortion is particularly high when importing goods (
Control Risks
, 2013). Companies report containers are held up at ports for long periods of time, even in cases of minor discrepancies in paperwork, and are only released in exchange for an illicit fee paid directly to a customs official (Control Risks, 2013).
Indonesian Public Procurement
Corruption and favouritism are pervasive in Indonesia's procurement sector. Lucrative contracts are allocated to firms associated with Indonesia's state officials, while foreign companies are often ignored in the tender process (
CCG 2014
). Companies involved in the sale of services to state agencies or state-owned companies report regularly providing gifts, expensive dinners and entertainment to officials during negotiations and/or when closing deals (
Control Risks
, 2013). Corruption in procurement costs Indonesia's government up to USD 4 billion per year (
FCPA Blog
, June 2014). To strengthen monitoring of the procurement procedure and to counteract corruption in the sector, President Jokowi introduced Presidential Instruction (Inpres) No 7/2017 (which provides for an upgraded online system for procurement, purchasing, auditing and taxation) in 2015. The president has given the National Development Planning Board superior authority to monitor and evaluate the implementation of the Inpres and to coordinate corruption eradication efforts with law enforcement agencies (
Jakarta Post
, May 2015).
In January 2014, the chairman of the ruling Democratic Party, Anans Urbaningrum, was arrested for alleged corruption and bribery in connection with the construction of a sports stadium in Hambalang. The arrest followed another corruption investigation involving former Youth and Sports Affairs Minister, Andi Alfian, who had accepted IDR 2.2 billion in
kickbacks
from a construction company in exchange for winning contract to build the stadium (
Jakarta Globe
, Jan. 2014). Alfian was sentenced to four years in prison and ordered to pay a fine of IDR 200 million (
AsiaReport
, July 2014).
Indonesian Natural Resources
Corruption and illegal logging are widespread in Indonesia. The forestry ministry is among the most corrupt institutions in the country (
Phys
, Nov. 2013). According to Indonesia's Corruption Eradication Commission, the KPK,
bribery
in the process of obtaining permits is the most common act of corruption in the country (
AFP
, Jan. 2014). The lack of law enforcement in Indonesia promotes an enabling environment both for irregular activities and for opaque financial reporting by petroleum and mining companies, forstering corruption in the extractive industries (
NRGI 2014
).
In May 2013, an Indonesian official was arrested for allegedly being in charge of an illegal logging ring worth USD 150 million (
AFP
, Jan. 2014). In another case, the former Indonesian governor, Rusli Zainal, was sentenced to 14 years in prison and ordered to pay USD 90,000 for accepting large-scale bribes in exchange for illegally issuing logging permits in Riau, where a huge amount of the forest has been lost to palm oil producers (
Mongabay
, Mar. 2014).
Indonesian Legislation
A weak institutional framework and widespread corruption limit the effectiveness of corruption-related legislation in Indonesia. The
Law No 31/1999 on Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption
criminalises the major acts of corruption, including active and passive bribery,
abuse of office
and
extortion
. Giving or accepting a bribe is a criminal act punishable by a fine of up to USD 110,000 and imprisonment of up to 20 years.
Embezzlement
, failure to report corrupt activities and
gifts
to public officials are punishable by Indonesia's
Criminal Code
. The
Law of the Republic of Indonesia No.8
criminalises money laundering. Public official asset declarations are required under the
Regulation on Asset Declaration 2005
. Public procurement is addressed by the Presidential Regulation No. 54/2010, which requires competitive bidding and blacklisting of companies for violations. Law No. 13 of 2006 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims provides protection for public and private employees who report corruption. There is no facilitation payment exception under Indonesia's criminal law, and legislation does not address bribery of foreign public officials. Indonesia has ratified the
United Nations Convention Against Corruption
(UNCAC). The
National Strategy of Corruption Prevention and Eradication 2012-2025
seeks to curb governmental corruption and improve the state's capacity to prevent corrupt practices and successfully implement mechanisms for reporting.
Indonesian Civil Society
Indonesia's
Constitution
provides for freedoms of speech and press. The media environment is open and vibrant in comparison to other countries in the region; however, press freedoms are restricted by legal and regulatory provisions (
FitW 2015
). Foreign ownership of broadcast media is forbidden, and journalists experience physical attacks and harassment by the state and non-state actors (
FotP 2014
). Independent reporters practice self-censorship to avoid criminal prosecution for libel and defamation, and legal restrictions lead to a number of broadcast media to operate illegally (FitW 2015). Journalists face threats of violence, and a growing number of journalists are being kidnapped and killed in Indonesia (
BTI 2014
).
Civil society organisations (CSOs) are restricted and must receive a special approval at the Home Affairs Ministry to operate in Indonesia (FotP 2014). Freedom of expression is restrained, but Indonesian CSOs are able to exert some degree of influence on the political decision-making process (FitW 2015). CSOs actively engage in various social and political issues, including corruption, authoritarianism and good governance (BTI 2014).
Indonesia Information Network
Indonesia Profile Sources
-
World Bank & IFC:
Doing Business 2015
.
-
Jakarta Post: 'Jokowi advances e-governance system to prevent corruption', 27 May 2015.
-
World Economic Forum:
Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015
.
-
US Commercial Service:
Doing Business in Indonesia: 2014 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies.
-
Bertelsmann Foundation:
Transformation Index - Indonesia 2014.
-
World Economic Forum:
Global Enabling Trade Report 2014.
-
Freedom House:
Freedom in the World - Indonesia 2014.
-
Freedom House:
Freedom of the Press - Indonesia 2014.
-
Asia Report: 'Indonesian ex-minister jailed for role in corruption', 19 July 2014.
-
FCPA Blog: 'Indonesia loses USD 4 billion annually to procurement fraud, study finds', 5 June 2014.
-
Deutsche Welle: 'Life sentence for Indonesia Constitutional Court Judge Akil Mochtar', 30 June 2014.
-
Mongabay: 'Indonesia politician gets 14 years in jail for illegal permits, forest corruption', 13 March 2014.
-
Jakarta Globe: 'Anas Detained by KPK Over Hambalang Corruption Case', 10 January 2014.
-
AFP: 'Indonesia struggles to clean up corrupt forestry sector', 1 January 2014.
-
Control Risks:
Anti-Corruption in Indonesia 2013
.
-
US Department of State:
Human Rights Practices Report – Indonesia 2013.
-
Phys: 'Indonesia struggles to clean up corrupt forestry sector', 13 November 2013.
-
Jakarta Globe: 'Jakarta High Court Sentences Djoko Susilo to 18 Years in Prison', 19 December 2013.
-
Freedom House:
Countries at the Crossroads - Indonesia 2012
.
-
Jakarta Post: 'RI loses trillions in taxes from systemic corruption', 14 March 2012.